We are limited by what we believe. It is inevitable. Our acquired philosophy will eventually be reflected in the life we lead. That which we believe to be true becomes our human experience. Depending on the structural integrity of one’s belief system, self-fulfilling-prophecy can be a blessing or a curse.
So how is it that we come to believe the things that we do?
Some of our truths are woven throughout our ancestral threads. Many of our fundamental beliefs are absorbed during our childhood. As adults, we interpret repeated experiences with reasoning. This accumulated wisdom then continues to define and confirm the truths we live by.
Often our beliefs are nothing more than something we heard once. Maybe we read it somewhere. It sounded true to us at the time, and a seed of reasoning was planted.
Perhaps this information simply addressed one of our “why?” questions so fittingly that we automatically filed it among our collection. Our brain is like a huge reference library. The ‘philosophy section’ accounts for a large portion of our acquired information. We rely on its resources daily to explain the stuff we do, and the stuff that does (or doesn’t) happen to us. If our judgment mode is active, we like to apply our acquired wisdom to the stuff that happens to other humans, too.
Nothing guarantees the longevity of a philosophical tidbit more effectively than proof. Once evidence is produced to uphold whatever it is you have stored in your reference library, the foundation for your operating system is established. Confirmation in the form of a personal experience, or one that is merely witnessed, will assure that this particular belief becomes one of the truths you live by. Belief-activation complete!
Jeez. The process of establishing functioning elements in our internal operating system is so damn meticulous and fail-safe. Is it any wonder why it can feel so difficult should we ever want to alter it?
Some of our personal belief structures serve us well. No altering is required. Satisfaction does not prompt change.
I really only began writing this essay since pondering a peculiar (yet satisfactory) element within my own system. While I was running along our street the other day, one of our neighbors slowed down her vehicle on approach. She rolled down her window to ask me how many miles I run a day. This isn’t the first time that someone has asked, nor was it the first time I responded with feigned certainty.
I have no idea how many miles I run. I could. James bought me a pedometer for Christmas, but the device has not been calibrated properly due to human error (mine).
The truth is that I act upon a dopey notion that has nothing to do with distance.
“During any form of exercise, a consistent level of physical activity must reach at least sixty minutes before you will begin to burn fat.”
I read that somewhere. I don’t even remember where I read it. My brain just sucked in the information a long time ago, and I have been stuck with it ever since.
Now when people ask me how many miles I run, I answer with a number that will generally satisfy inquiring minds.
“About six miles,” I say.
This is not accurate. I don’t care.
All I know is that it takes me about an hour to run about five miles. I think. It just seems simpler to respond with this number than to explain that “I have no idea and I don’t really care. I’m only doing it as long as it takes to burn some fat off my butt.”
I like bacon. I like cheesecake, too. I also feel as if my life would not be complete without unlimited grazing privileges in the field of chocolate peppermint patties. Running for at least sixty minutes levels the playground of indulgence where I can eat whatever I want.
Had I read that it is possible to burn fat with mind control, I might be attempting to operate within an alternative belief structure. Too late. Not interested. Running is fun and cheese cake is good. Satisfaction does not prompt a desire for change, so the sixty-minute philosophy will remain my truth.
“If it isn’t broken, don’t fix it.”
Unless you have a workaholic mind, there is no reason to ever explore the intricate dynamics of your belief system. I only think about this stuff when I have sixty minutes to kill.
Recurring facets of your life that are pleasing do not necessarily pose questions about your programming. What about the ones that do?
I had one pesky operating manual that was super-glued to a shelf in the philosophy section of my brain for years. It was titled, “Two Steps Forward and One Step Back.”
Have you heard of it? Wildly popular among the low self-esteem crowd, it has been topping the best-seller list for centuries in the book store at the School of Hard Knocks.
I tried to pry it off my shelf with a crowbar once, but the thing weighs a ton. Cunning and deceitful, it postures itself as a sensible and user-friendly book until you question it’s purpose. Once it suspects that you are attempting removal, it will reciprocate with a cleverly-placed testament within your own life experience. It has withstood the test of time and will not be trifled with.
Do not ignore it. I tried that, too.
This book has a rock-solid structure behind its theory and it will continue to prove it. It feeds on frustration. Often unseen, it boasts endless woven fibers of repeated verification throughout its lengthy pages. It has history.
Want to release it from primary control?
Treat it as the legend that it is. Accept its worth. Host a retirement party that the rest of the books in your system will talk about for years to come. Give appreciation for the purpose it has so gallantly served throughout your historical journey. Honor its worth for the comfort it has provided during times of struggle. Show respect for the view it had offered during those times when you did not believe that progress toward a goal was even possible.
Everything responds to love and acceptance. Even big, fat, over-bloated theories on life will rescind their duties when given the proper appreciation for the purpose they have served.
Glorious retirement from active duty allows the addition of fresh material. Without any resistance, new energy is welcomed with ease. Testing stages for more appealing theories have a chance for inclusion among life’s recurring experiences.
I started with a simple and concise version titled, “Two Steps Forward Equals Two Steps Forward.” This one fits on the shelf nicely.
There have since been many more additions to my philosophy section, including the latest edition of “Effortless Steps.” Riveting. I can’t seem to put it down.
For what is a belief, really, if not an attractive explanation that you roll over in your mind, think of often, and repeat to yourself over and over again until it becomes your truth.
At least, that’s what I read somewhere:)